Short answer: the pack is the same seven statements. What changes is the evidence behind them. A proprietor has no statutory audit, often files a return with no balance sheet in it, and frequently runs the business through the same bank account as the household. The bank therefore reads the CMA against three things it can check — your income-tax return, your GST returns and your bank statements — and the pack has to agree with all three.
What is actually different
For a company, the bank starts from audited financial statements and asks the CMA to project them forward. For a proprietor, the starting point is thinner:
| Company | Proprietorship | |
|---|---|---|
| Past financials | Audited under the Companies Act | Audited only if tax audit applies; otherwise provisional |
| The return | Full financials attached | Under Section 44AD, no P&L or balance sheet at all |
| Net worth | Share capital plus reserves | Your capital account, after drawings |
| Bank account | The company's | Often shared with the household |
| Who is liable | The company | You, personally, on everything |
None of that makes a proprietor a worse borrower. It means the branch has to decide what to believe, and the pack should make that easy rather than hard.
The presumptive-return problem
If you file under Section 44AD, your return declares a profit of 8% of turnover — 6% on banking-channel receipts — and stops there. There is no profit and loss account, no balance sheet, no capital account.
The bank still needs the past columns of Form II and Form III, so it asks for provisional financials for those years. Two things go wrong at this point:
- The margin contradicts the return. A CMA that shows 14% net profit for a year in which the return declared 8% is not lying — presumptive is a floor, not a finding — but it has to be explained, because the credit officer will ask which figure to rely on. The projection should build from the real margin with the presumptive basis stated alongside it.
- The balance sheet is reconstructed badly. A closing capital account that cannot be walked back through drawings and profits to an opening figure is the first thing a reviewer tests. Reconstruct it from the bank statements, not from memory.
Whether the presumptive election was right in the first place is a separate question — see Section 44AD or regular books — but for the CMA, the practical point is that a proprietor who has never prepared financials now has to, and they have to reconcile.
Net worth is your capital account
In Form III the bank reclassifies your balance sheet into current, term and net worth. For a proprietor, net worth is the capital account: capital introduced plus retained profit, less drawings.
Three points decide how that number reads:
- Drawings are visible. A proprietor drawing more than the business earns is running the net worth down, and the trend across the past columns shows it. Where drawings were large for a stated reason — a property purchase, a family event — say so.
- Family loans can be quasi-equity. Unsecured loans from a spouse or parent, formally subordinated to the bank, are often treated as part of net worth for the TOL/TNW ratio. Left as ordinary unsecured loans, they count against you. The subordination letter is worth the effort.
- Personal assets are not business net worth. A house in your own name may be offered as collateral, but it does not sit in Form III. Mixing the two produces a balance sheet the bank will unpick.