Short answer: presumptive taxation is s.58 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
For professionals it means declaring 50% of gross receipts as income. It is
simpler, and it is cheaper only if your actual cost ratio is below 50%.
Professionals — unlike businesses — face no lock-in and can decide year by
year.
For the thresholds, the 5% cash test and the audit interaction in detail, see
presumptive taxation under Section 58.
This note is about the decision rather than the mechanics.
Under presumptive, actual expenses stop mattering. You do not deduct them, you
do not substantiate them, and you do not need books to support them.
That is the whole bargain: certainty and simplicity in exchange for a fixed
margin assumption. Whether the bargain is good depends entirely on how your real
margin compares to the assumed one.
The comparison is arithmetically simple and most professionals have never done it:
| Presumptive | Books |
|---|
| Income taxed | 50% of receipts | Receipts less actual expenses |
| Better when | Real costs are below 50% | Real costs are above 50% |
| Books required | No | Yes |
| Audit | Not on this basis | Where thresholds are crossed |
| Advance tax | One instalment, by 15 March | Four instalments |
Below 50% costs — presumptive wins. An independent consultant, a freelance
developer, a practitioner working from home: laptop, software, phone, some travel.
Real costs of 15–25% are common. Presumptive taxes them on 50%, so they are taxed
on materially less than they earned, entirely lawfully.
Above 50% costs — presumptive is expensive. A practice with employed staff,
leased premises, professional indemnity, subscriptions and licence fees can run
past 50% without difficulty. Presumptive then taxes income that was never made,
and the "simplicity" is being bought at the marginal rate.
The awkward middle is a practice that grew. The consultant who was at 20% costs
when they started and is at 55% now, with two employees and an office, is very
likely still filing on the basis that suited them three years ago.
A genuine asymmetry worth knowing.
The business presumptive scheme has a five-year consequence for opting out
— leave, and you are kept out for a period, which makes the decision semi-permanent
and worth agonising over.
The professional scheme has no such lock-in. A professional can choose each
year on that year's facts. If you run a business rather than a profession, that
five-year bar is the whole decision — see
Section 44AD or regular books.
So the decision is not a strategic commitment. It is an annual comparison, and
it should be re-run whenever the practice changes shape — taking on staff, taking
premises, a year with unusually high or low costs.
Not a lock-in, but real: declaring below the presumptive rate triggers books and
audit, where income exceeds the basic exemption limit.
So the choice is not quite free. Moving off presumptive in a year means:
- maintaining books for that year, and
- an audit, with its cost and its deadline.
That has to be in the comparison. If the tax saved by declaring actual income is
smaller than the cost and hassle of the audit, presumptive is still the better
answer even at a cost ratio above 50%.
And critically: this has to be decided before the year is filed, because the
books either exist for that year or they do not. A professional who decides in
September that last year's actual costs were 60% cannot reconstruct compliant books
retrospectively.
Often overlooked. A taxpayer under presumptive pays advance tax in a single
instalment by 15 March, rather than four instalments across the year.
That is a real cash-flow benefit, independent of the tax computation, and it is
worth something on its own for a practice with uneven receipts.
The flip side: there is no earlier instalment to have partly covered you. Miss
15 March and interest runs on the whole liability.
- What is your actual cost ratio this year — not three years ago?
- Are you within the threshold, and does the 5% cash test apply to you?
- If moving off presumptive, are books being maintained from the start of the
year?
- Has the audit cost been weighed against the tax saved?
- Is the 15 March advance tax date in the calendar, if staying presumptive?
This is a working reference, not the statute. For anything you are relying on,
confirm the section text and current thresholds directly.