Short answer: five conditions, and all five must hold. Supplier in India, recipient outside India, place of supply outside India, payment in convertible foreign exchange, and supplier and recipient not establishments of the same person. Fail one and the entire supply is domestic and taxable.
The five conditions
| # | Condition | Where it usually fails |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supplier located in India | Rarely an issue |
| 2 | Recipient located outside India | Where the contracting party differs from who actually receives the benefit |
| 3 | Place of supply outside India | The specific place-of-supply rules that override the default |
| 4 | Payment in convertible foreign exchange (or INR where permitted) | Documentation, or receipt through an Indian intermediary account |
| 5 | Supplier and recipient not merely establishments of the same person | Branch and head office structures |
The common misconception is that this is really a one-condition test — foreign client, foreign currency, done. It is not, and the two that most often defeat otherwise genuine exports are three and five.
Condition 3: place of supply
The default for a service to a foreign recipient is the recipient's location, which puts it outside India and satisfies the condition.
But there are specific rules that override the default, and where one applies the place of supply can land in India even though the client is abroad. The categories to check:
- Services performed on goods physically made available by the recipient.
- Services requiring physical presence of the recipient or their representative.
- Services relating to immovable property located in India.
- Admission to, or organisation of, events held in India.
Each of those can put the place of supply in India regardless of who is paying or from where.
The largest of these overrides — the intermediary rule — has now been removed. Section 13(8)(b) was omitted with effect from 30 March 2026, so intermediary services to overseas recipients no longer have their place of supply forced to India. That change is significant enough to have its own note: the intermediary trap is gone.
Condition 5: the establishment test
The one people find least intuitive, because it does not depend on anything commercial.
Export treatment is denied where the supplier and recipient are merely two establishments of the same person. The test is legal identity:
- Indian branch → its own overseas head office. One person. Not an export, no matter how the invoicing is arranged or in what currency.
- Indian subsidiary → its foreign parent. Two persons. Can be an export, subject to the other conditions.
For a captive operation set up to serve a foreign group, this is the condition that decides everything, and it is decided by how the entity was structured — often years earlier, for reasons that had nothing to do with GST.