CA K Sanjay BhargavChartered Accountant
Open menu
← All articles

Stock statements and drawing power: the number that decides what you can actually draw

CA K Sanjay Bhargav, Chartered Accountant, Bengaluru

Membership No. 250054 · DISA (ICAI)

Published

Short answer: the sanction letter fixes a ceiling. What you can actually draw each month is drawing power, computed by the bank from the stock and book-debt statement you file — paid stock less the margin, plus eligible debtors less their margin, capped at the limit. A late or careless statement does not just cost penal interest. Under the RBI's norms it can make the account irregular, and ninety days of that makes it an NPA with no default at all.

The two numbers, and why they differ

What it isWho sets it
Sanctioned limitThe maximum the bank has agreed to lend on the facilityThe sanction, once a year
Drawing powerThe amount you may actually draw this monthThe bank, from your statement, every month

Drawing power is almost always lower than the limit, and it moves. A month of slow collections, a supplier who extends credit, a debtor who slips past ninety days — each one changes the number without anything changing on the sanction.

How the bank computes it

The arithmetic is standard even though the margins are not:

Step
1Stock, at cost, from the statement
2Less trade creditors — the stock your supplier is still financing
3= Paid stock
4Less the stock margin in the sanction (commonly 25%)
5= Drawing power on stock
6Book debts not older than the eligible period (commonly 90 days)
7Less the debtor margin in the sanction (commonly 40%)
8= Drawing power on debtors
9Total drawing power = 5 + 8, capped at the sanctioned limit

A worked example, on a ₹50 lakh limit with 25% and 40% margins:

Stock40,00,000
Less creditors12,00,000
Paid stock28,00,000
Less 25% margin7,00,000
DP on stock21,00,000
Debtors within 90 days30,00,000
Less 40% margin12,00,000
DP on debtors18,00,000
Drawing power39,00,000

The borrower holds ₹70 lakh of current assets and a ₹50 lakh limit, and can draw ₹39 lakh. Nothing is wrong. That is the design: the bank funds the part of the working capital cycle you own outright, at a margin.

The three things that quietly reduce it

Creditors. Stock bought on credit is deducted before the margin is applied. A business that negotiates 60-day supplier terms — sound commercially — finds its drawing power falling as a result. The two are not independent, and a supplier-credit decision is also a drawing-power decision.

Ageing. Receivables past the eligible period drop out entirely, not partially. A ₹10 lakh debtor at 95 days contributes nothing. Statements that report total debtors without an ageing are recomputed by the branch on whatever ageing it holds, which is rarely to your advantage.

The cut-off. Statements received after the bank's cut-off leave the previous month's drawing power in force. A good month reported late is a good month the account never sees.

What a late statement actually costs

The visible cost is the penal interest most sanction letters attach to a late statement. It is small and it is not the point.

The point is the RBI's asset-classification norms for cash credit and overdraft accounts. Drawings permitted against a stock statement that is more than three months old are treated as irregular. Where that irregularity continues for ninety days, the account is classified as a non-performing asset — with every instalment paid and every interest debit honoured.

That reclassification has consequences well beyond the bank: it reaches the credit bureau, it reaches every other lender's covenant checks, and it is disclosed. A borrower who has never missed a payment can acquire an NPA history by leaving three stock statements in a drawer.

The same norms treat an account as out of order where the outstanding stays above the drawing power for ninety days continuously — which is how a falling drawing power, uncorrected, turns a healthy limit into an irregular one without a single fresh drawing.

The statement is evidence, not a formality

The bank holds every stock statement you have filed, and it reads them again at renewal — against the CMA data that supported the limit in the first place.

The CMA asserted holding periods: so many days of inventory, so many days of receivables. The stock statements are the monthly proof of whether that was true. A CMA that projected 60 days of stock beside twelve statements showing 120 is read at renewal, and the CMA loses. That renewal exercise, and what the branch compares, is set out in CMA data for a cash credit renewal; the Form IV holding periods the statements have to agree with are in the CMA data format, form by form.

Before the next statement goes in

  1. Take the figures from the books, on the date the sanction specifies, not from an estimate.
  2. Deduct creditors yourself and apply the margins, so the drawing power the bank arrives at is the one you expected.
  3. Age the debtors and exclude what is past the eligible period before the branch does.
  4. Check the outstanding against the drawing power — not against the limit — and reduce it if it is above.
  5. Diarise the cut-off, because a statement filed on the 12th when the cut-off was the 10th is a month lost.
  6. Keep the statements consistent with the CMA you gave the bank, or be ready to explain why the business changed.

The worksheet below reproduces the computation — enter stock, creditors, the debtors ageing and your sanction margins, and it produces the drawing power the bank should arrive at, alongside a monthly log so the trend is visible before the branch sees it.

This is a working reference on general practice and the RBI's classification norms as they stand. Margins, the eligible debtor age, cut-off dates and penal terms are set by your own sanction letter, which is the authority for your account.

Download the stock statement and drawing power worksheet

Your sanction terms entered once, the nine-step drawing power computation, a debtors ageing that feeds it, a twelve-month log and the two RBI checks that turn a healthy limit irregular. CSV — opens in Excel or Google Sheets.

Your number is used to answer questions on the worksheet and on bank documentation. No third-party sharing, and you can ask to be removed at any time.

Frequently asked questions

What is drawing power?

The amount you are actually permitted to draw against a cash credit or overdraft limit in a given month. It is computed by the bank from the stock and book-debt statement you file, after deducting creditors and applying the margins in your sanction letter. The sanctioned limit is the ceiling; drawing power is the operative number, and it is usually lower.

How is it calculated?

Broadly: paid stock — stock less trade creditors — reduced by the stock margin, plus eligible receivables reduced by the debtor margin, capped at the sanctioned limit. The margins are in your sanction letter; 25% on stock and 40% on debtors are common, but they vary by bank and by borrower. Receivables older than the period your sanction allows, commonly 90 days, are excluded before the margin is applied.

Why are creditors deducted?

Because stock you have not paid for is already financed by your supplier. The bank lends against the part of the stock you own outright — the paid stock — so trade creditors come off before the margin is applied. A business that runs on long supplier credit finds its drawing power well below the limit for exactly this reason.

What happens if I file the statement late?

Two things, on different timescales. Most sanction letters carry penal interest for a late statement, which is the visible cost. The larger one sits in the RBI's asset-classification norms: drawings against a statement more than three months old are treated as irregular, and if that irregularity continues for ninety days the account is classified as a non-performing asset — with no missed payment anywhere.

My statement shows more stock than the drawing power reflects. Why?

Usually one of three things. The bank has applied the margin and the creditor deduction, which you had not. Receivables beyond the eligible age have been excluded. Or the statement was received after the cut-off and the previous month's drawing power is still in force. The computation is arithmetic, so the reason is always findable — the worksheet below reproduces it.

Does the stock statement have to agree with the CMA?

It has to be consistent with it, and the branch has both. A CMA that projected 60 days of inventory beside twelve stock statements showing 120 days is read at renewal, and the CMA loses. The statements are the monthly evidence of the holding periods the CMA asserted, which is why they are worth preparing carefully rather than as a formality.

Cash credit limit sanctioned but the usable amount keeps changing?

Send your sanction letter, the last three stock statements and the debtors ageing. How your drawing power is being computed, why it is below the limit, and whether the statements agree with what the CMA promised are worked out before the next one is filed.

Related service: CMA Data & Project Reports