Short answer: a property abroad is the one foreign asset the ₹20 lakh Black Money Act threshold never covers, so a Dubai flat missing from Schedule FA carries exposure to a ₹10 lakh penalty under section 43 for each year it was left out. FAST-DS 2026 can close that until 31 December 2026. If the flat was bought with taxed money sent through a bank, it is Entry 2: a flat ₹1,00,000, provided its value at 31 March 2026 does not exceed ₹5 crore. If the source of the money cannot be explained, it is Entry 1: 60% of value, but only within an aggregate of ₹1 crore, which few Dubai properties are under. Rent never taxed is a separate item. If the only wrong return is AY 2026-27, revise it instead.
Why property is the asset not to have left out
The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 penalises a resident and ordinarily resident individual who leaves a foreign asset out of a return. Since 1 October 2024 its penalty provisions (sections 42 and 43), and now its prosecution provisions (sections 49 and 50), do not apply to foreign assets worth up to ₹20 lakh other than immovable property. The carve-out is in the text. A studio bought for a few lakh of dirhams is outside the threshold as surely as a villa.
| Foreign brokerage account worth ₹15 lakh | Dubai flat, any value | |
|---|---|---|
| Section 43 penalty, ₹10 lakh a year | Does not apply | Applies |
| Prosecution under section 50 | Does not apply | Not excluded |
| Counts towards the ₹20 lakh | Yes | No |
The penalty is not automatic. A Special Bench of the Mumbai Tribunal held in Vinil Venugopal (October 2025) that "may" in section 43 makes it discretionary, so a bona fide omission of a tax-paid asset can be argued as a technical breach. That is a defence to run after a notice, with the onus on you, not a plan. How the threshold works is in the ₹20 lakh threshold.
First question: how did the money leave India?
FAST-DS has two entries, and which one a Dubai property falls in is decided by its funding, not by choice.
| How the purchase was paid | FAST-DS entry | Cost | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRS remittances through an Indian bank, from salary or savings already taxed in India | Entry 2(b): asset from income offered to tax, not in Schedule FA | ₹1,00,000 flat | Value ≤ ₹5 crore |
| From UAE or other foreign earnings while you were non-resident, never reported after you became resident | Entry 2(a): asset from income earned while non-resident | ₹1,00,000 flat | Value ≤ ₹5 crore |
| Cash, an informal transfer, money held abroad whose origin you cannot document, or income never taxed | Entry 1: undisclosed asset located outside India | 60% of value | Aggregate of Entry 1 items ≤ ₹1 crore |
| Partly through a UAE mortgage or other borrowing | Does not fit either entry neatly | — | Needs a considered view |
The test for Entry 1 is the definition of an "undisclosed asset located outside India" in section 131(1)(j) of the Finance Act, 2026: one for which you have no explanation of the source of investment, or one the Assessing Officer finds unsatisfactory. A purchase traceable through bank remittance advices, Form A2 and your own bank statements to taxed money has an explanation. Assemble that trail before deciding anything: the remittance advices, the TCS credit in Form 26AS, and the returns for the years the money was earned.
A mortgage-funded purchase is awkward twice over. The borrowing explains the source, so the asset is arguably not "undisclosed", but a loan is not "income offered to tax" either, so Entry 2(b) does not obviously fit. And a resident borrowing from a UAE bank needs RBI permission under the FEMA (Borrowing and Lending) Regulations, 2018, which FAST-DS does not touch. That case needs advice on its own facts.
Valuing the flat under Rule 3
Value matters even under Entry 2, because it decides whether you are under the ₹5 crore ceiling. Rule 3(1)(d) of the FAST-DS Rules, 2026 values immovable property at the higher of:
| Measure | Source |
|---|---|
| Cost of acquisition | Price, the DLD registration fee and other acquisition costs |
| Open-market price on 31 March 2026 | Estimated by a valuer recognised by the government of the country where the property is located; for Dubai, a valuer recognised by the UAE authorities |
If no valuation is carried out, the indexed cost of acquisition is deemed to be the fair market value, with "indexed cost" taking its meaning from section 48 of the 1961 Act. That is a fallback, not a shortcut, and it can land above or below the market.
Points specific to a Dubai purchase:
- Currency. Rule 3 converts at the RBI reference rate on the valuation date, routing through US dollars where there is no direct rate. The dirham is pegged at 3.6725 to the dollar, so both routes give nearly the same answer. Take the exact rate for 31 March 2026 from the published reference rate, not a bank's selling rate.
- An off-plan unit still under construction at 31 March 2026 is not obviously "immovable property" as built. It may fall to be valued as "any other asset" under Rule 3(1)(g), at the higher of the amount invested and its open-market price. Either way, the amount paid to date is the floor.
- A property sold before 31 March 2026 is still declarable. Rule 3(2) values it at the higher of cost and sale price; if the proceeds were put into a foreign bank account or another property, Rule 3(3) moves the value to the new asset rather than counting it twice.
- The 20% tolerance applies. Under Rule 5(2), a variance of up to 20% between your declared value and the value later determined does not, by itself, invalidate the declaration. It covers property; it does not cover bank accounts. It does not rescue a declaration that is over a ceiling.
The general valuation rules, and why a bank account is valued so differently, are in FAST-DS 2026, explained.