Short answer: most sectors take 100% foreign ownership through the automatic route, with no prior approval. What actually delays an India entry is rarely the investment approval — it is the resident director requirement, and for investors connected to a land-bordering country, Press Note 3, which was amended in March 2026.
The investment route decides the timetable
Two routes exist, and which one applies decides whether entry takes weeks or months.
Automatic route. No prior approval from the government or the RBI. In most sectors — IT and software, most manufacturing, B2B e-commerce and much else — a foreign parent may hold 100% of an Indian company as a wholly owned subsidiary, with no Indian partner required.
Approval route. A minority of sectors, plus anything caught by Press Note 3. Prior government approval, on its own timetable.
Establishing which route the proposed activity falls into is the first task on any entry, before a name is reserved or a structure chosen. Sectoral caps and conditions apply in a smaller number of sectors and can change the shareholding you were planning.
Press Note 3, and what changed in March 2026
Press Note 3 of 2020 required prior government approval for any foreign investment from an entity of a country sharing a land border with India — China, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Afghanistan — or where the beneficial owner of the investment sits in, or is a citizen of, one of them.
That beneficial-owner limb is the one that catches people. An investment routed through Singapore or Mauritius is not outside Press Note 3 merely because the immediate investor is elsewhere; the test looks through to who ultimately owns it.
In March 2026 the Union Cabinet approved an amendment. The position now:
| Investment from a land-bordering country | Route |
|---|---|
| Up to 10%, non-controlling | Automatic, subject to sectoral caps |
| Above 10%, or resulting in control | Government approval, as before |
| Critical manufacturing sectors | Approval, with a stated 60-day processing window |
This is a genuine liberalisation for minority and financial investors, and no change at all for anyone taking a controlling stake. If you are working from guidance written before March 2026 — which is most of what is online — it will tell you approval is required in every case.
The requirement that actually blocks incorporation
Section 149(3): every company must have at least one director who has stayed in India for at least 182 days during the financial year.
This applies to every company. A wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign parent is not exempt. Nor is a joint venture, nor a dormant company.
For a founder intending to run the entity from abroad, this is the real constraint, and it has to be solved before incorporation rather than discovered during it. The days need not be continuous — they are aggregated across the year — and for a company incorporated part-way through the year the requirement applies proportionately to the remainder, which is worth confirming for your specific incorporation date.
The penalty is a continuing one, so it does not wait:
- The company — ₹50,000, plus ₹500 for each day the default continues, up to ₹3,00,000
- Every officer in default, directors included — ₹50,000, plus ₹500 per day, up to ₹1,00,000